

The Ever-Controversial Ones #1, Frank Lampard
By: Rob | March 25th, 2008Some players, like let us say, Maldini, never get any critisism, quite rightly. Its become such a cliché about his legendary status that its hardly worth going over again. Not all of the top-level players are treated in the same way though, as this hopefully ongoing theme will explore. Every now and then, I’ll take a player, who while loved by some, is loathed by others and we can debate whether he is indeed, a world class player. The first in this series, for your interest is Chelsea’s ever-unpopular second in command, Frank Lampard.
Assuming this is a popular idea, keep your eyes peeled, for Steven Gerrard, Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Totti, Rio Ferdinand, David Beckham and any other player who you might have heard called World Class who you disagreed with. I’m open to suggestions; the only pre-requisite is that they do, or have, played in the Champions League - that is why we’re here after all.
Frank Lampard really is one of those players, you just like or not. His sucsess can’t be argued with - he’s been nominated several times for European and World Footballer of the Year, won 60 England caps to date and has a massive haul of trophies. But, he isn’t as respected as those stats might suggest. Labelled ‘Fat Frank’ by (harsh - the fella isn’t fat whatever his faults) non-Chelsea supporters, Lampard is often mocked for his shooting. He is however the only midfield player to get 4 goals in a Premier League game(this was against Derby however), and has hit double figures in goals from midfield in every one of the last 4 seasons. He has also been practically ever-present in a Chelsea side that has moved to dominate the EPL, as well as being one of the only survining members of the pre-Roman era.
Lampard started his carrer at West Ham, captaining thier youth side in the 1995/6 season, and began to knock on the door of the first team a year later, untill a broken leg put an end to that season for him. He came back strongly however, and was a part of the superemly talented West Ham side that climbed to 5th in the Premier League along with Micheal Carrick, Joe Cole and Lampard’s close friend, Rio Ferdinand. Guided by his uncle Harry Redknapp, Lampard became the focal point of the team, ever present in that sucsessful season. Redknapp however soon left the club, Rio followed him out of the Upton Park door, and Lampard would be next - presumably feeling he would have to move to loose the ‘Junior’ tag that was always attached to his name while he was at a club where his dad was (and still is) such a legend.
He signed for Chelsea, for £11m and was in his first two seasons, pretty much ever-present, though the young midfielder often failed to live up to his pricetag and was outshone in a side built around Chelsea legend Gianfranco Zola. His second season was more of a sucsess, he netted 8 goals from midfield and Chelsea siezed an impressive fourth (on the last day of the season) and a Champions League spot.
He was moved into the attacking midfield spot when Zola retired and despite the threat of Roman’s millions meaning that seemingly anyone could be bought in to replace anyone else, Lampard kept his place, and in fact the team was built entirely around him (some will argue of course, this is exactly what Lampard needs). He seemed to thrive, Chelsea, reached the Semi-Final of that seasons Champions League, and Lampard notched double figures in the goal steaks. They lost to French Side Monaco in the CL semi. Chelsea finished second in the Premier League, behind Arsenal.
The 2004-5 season was massive for Chelsea. They made it to another Champions League semi-final, and won the Premier League by 12 points. Lampard played every single one of the league games for the club, and scored 13 goals from midfield. Dutch Legend Johan Cruyff called him “The best midfield player in Europe”, and Brazil legend Carlos Alberto agreed. He came second in the World Footballer of the Year stakes, behind Ronaldinho. This was also the case in the European Footballer of the Year contest. He also won fans player of the year.
He has also been labeled by Mattius Sammer and Jose Mourinho as The Best Player in the World.
Lampard scored 21 goals in all competetions last season including a wonderful chipped goal against Barca. But doubts began to creep in around the 2006 World Cup, where despite infinate efforts on goal, Lampard failed to find the net once. In fact, this is the main critisim of Lampard, that though he does get 20 goals a season, he only finds the net with a small percentage of the shots his has on goal. He has also been booed in an England shirt frequently, seemingly taking the blame for the percieved lack of cohesion between himself and Liverpool midfielder Steven Gerrard.
He has also been accused of scoring from deflections, although I remember a report in the Guardian awhile ago that showed that only Six of his goals have come this way.
He is Seventh on Chelsea’s all time goalscorer’s list, incredible for a midfield player. He also holds the record for consecutive premiership appearences, showing his importance to the Chelsea team.
He currently has 14 England goals to his name, in over 60 appearences, which is less impressive, but not bad. That equates to roughly 1 goal in every 4 appearances, which for a midfield player is not bad at all.
So Lampard. Love him? Loathe him. Lets debate him. And suggest some more for me to mull over.
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



hes fat
Posted from
United States

-



Thank God for intellegent debate.
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



He’s the Marmite of Premiership footballers.
Posted from
United States

-



can i touch you?
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



Rob,
I always regard him as the best midfield player. People only judge him on his goals. But his work-rate, pass completion rate etc is second to none whenever he is playing in the team. Even in WC2006 when he was going thru the lean patch he had highest work rate and pass completion rate amongst all the English players. He was central figure in Chelsea team and Mourinho was not foolish to build his team around him. And in 04-05 season he was the best player in Chelsea team which i think is the best team I’ve seen this decade in PL. I don’t understand how can you English berate him when he is such a good player. May be your media has given tag of “saint” to Steven Gerrard. Hence his ordinary passes are made as world class. Mind you, Steven Gerrard is what today because of 2-3 matches. Lampard is what today because of 2-3 seasons. Consistency is important.BTW what Jose Mourinho always said about Lampard, “When he is good he is best player in team and when he is bad he is second best player in the team”. Mourinho is not foolish to trust this lieutenant so much in his trophy winning seasons.
Posted from
India

-



And yes he is world class.
Posted from
India

-



Rob,
BTW do you have any apprehensions in saying that he is world class?Posted from
India

-



No, I actually really rate him - moreso than Gerrard actually who while also a good player, I think is a touch overrated. I would call them both World Class though for thier position.
The reason I started with him as much as anything is because he is berrated by anyone outside of London these days, and I find it a little baffling the extent to which is has become, and sort of hoped for a debate here on his quality or otherwise. Why is he such a marmite footballer?
Posted from
United States

-



i wouldnt exactly say gerrard isnt incosistent. He has been the focal point in the liverpool side for ages and imo isnt that like lampard. Lampard is a great player but his work rate has dropped off from previous seasons. World class means that he could basically go into any team and find a spot and i think mostly thats true, alot of coaches have respect for lampard but he wont be remembered as an all time great.
Posted from
Australia

-



While Gerrard is undoubtedly the focal point of the Liverpool side, its not the most consistant Liverpool side - barring the Champions League where they always look good.
I think Lampard could wander into most sides, maybe not Barca because he’s too similar to Deco, but other than that he would be warrenting a spot. I think its interested that he might not be remembered as great as some of his peers when he’s probably just as good.
Posted from
United States

-



The problem with Lampard is that, while his work-rate is exceptional (and he plays 40+ games a season consistently), some of the other attributes you would associate with clear-cut world class players are lacking: pace, vision; movement, anticipation, and touch are ok, but not great. He’s the decathlete of modern football: good at many things, but exceptional at none. He works, and did work well under Mourinho, at Chelsea because they play the possessional passing game more often than not, for which he is ideal. However, I don’t know whether that is enough for him to be considered world class (at least, under my definition of that phrase).
Posted from
United States

-



Its true that one person’s definition of World Class is going to be different from anothers - thats an interesting side-debate anyway,.
The Decathlete analogy is quite a good one - but I wouldn tend to think of that as quite positive I suppose. Maybe it means there is more to his game than some other more obvious players.
The main problem with Lampard though, ironically considering what I just said - is that that a team has to be built around him I think, because he can only really play attacking centre-midfield, and plays his game regardless of the players around him.
Posted from
United States

-



I’d probably agree with you about whether being a “decathlete” was a good or bad thing, but I suppose it makes it harder for you to be played out of the game — unless you’re playing badly, of course!
Unless he proves us wrong any time soon, I’d have to agree that I can only really see him play that one role; in which case, in order to best utilize him, the team has to accommodate him.
But, having said all this, there’s this feeling that I’ve got that I’m not really satisfied with my own “conclusions”: there’s just something about Lampard that doesn’t seem right, something that I haven’t identified, like he’s missing something important that means we’ll always be arguing this question. Maybe it’s methodology, his approach to the game: where (I imagine) he sees a pass as necessary to achieve something, a great player would see it as something that must be done in its own right…perhaps?…I don’t know…
Posted from
United States

-



@ish,
He is wanted by all the top clubs across Europe. And he will always remembered as heartbeat of Chelsea’s success story.@Ak,
To be world class you need pace, vision, movement, anticipationVision: Look at this season’s game against Man City at SB. Man City were flying high. Or his goal against Barca last season. People get blinded by his goals tally. But he happens to be guy with most assist at Chelsea. And those Assist are also in double figures. If Drogba became worldclass due to direct passing game of Chelsea then Lampard is feeder to his most of the goals. That settles the issue of Vision.
Movement: He is known for his late runs in box and thats why he scores so many goals. His movement in midfield is top class too. Hence whole team is generally built around him.
Anticipation: Same as above.
Touch: Stats dont lie when it comes to passing. And if you are talking about first touch then its also as good as any other midfielder.
Pace: Only grey area in my opinion. But Lampard’s game is built up like a playmaker from midfield at WHU. And now pure attacking midfielder at Chelsea. It doesnt hinder the team performances.
If you say that he is jack of all and master of none then you are wrong here. There are many unique things which he is master. Like late runs or long balls. He is phenomenal in these things.
Posted from
India

-



^^
*assistsPosted from
India

-



Adam, I really don’t know: I still think that, while he is very good at a lot of those things, he not really great at any of them…but then again, what do I know! I just have this gut feeling that there’s something lacking in his game that I haven’t properly identified. Maybe it’s just me: maybe my qualifications for “world class” are mythologically high! Let me just say that if he’s not world class, then he’s about as close as you can be to it.
Posted from
United States

-



@adam
im not seeing he isnt a top class player. He has amazing talents and he is amazing. I think the big problem with lampard is he doesnt have the press friendly game. I think he makes what he does look too simple. because of that no one sees his talents. Sometimes he pulls off some amazing shit, like a couple of his curling passes to drogba and the fa cup assist were beautiful. His goals are also quite beautiful as well.Also imo opinion there are only like a hand ful of world class players. Players that have won everything, players that are seen with awe, pele , cruyff, maradona, di stefano, stoichkov, maldini, baresi etc. Players that are the template that all other players are compared too.
Posted from
United States

-



It looks like The Definition of World Class would be a good future topic around these parts.
Seems like Lampard was a good opening choice as well, anyone got any shouts as to who they would like to see next? I have a couple of ideas but am open to suggestions.
Posted from
United States

-



I agree with ish: I’d put Lampard in the level below them, the “great players” level as opposed to the “once-in-a-generation” level. Rob, maybe you should, in order to reduce as much of the semantic ambiguity as possible, pick a list of clear world-class players, and ask is this-or-that person in the same level, but that’s easier said than done!
I was also going to suggest a few names, but I couldn’t think of ones that you already hadn’t picked (Gerrard, Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Totti, Ferdinand, Beckham). Are Schmeichel, Maldini, Keane, Giggs, and Zidane givens?
Posted from
United States

-



@Ak, Ish
The names you guys are mentioning have achieved something on international level. But in Lamprd’s case (or in any other English players case) that is big void which remains unfilled. May be this is what something hindering him to be “once in a decade” midfielder category.@Rob,
Beckham (media or quality), Gerrard (only plays on European nights), Pipo, Ruud V Nistelrooy etc. There are too many of them.Posted from
India

-



Where was he before Roman’s billions? Just an average footballer. The team make him look good. If he played in any other team apart from Chelsea he wouldn’t have a clue.
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



Thats just not true Jaymam. He was the star player in an incredibly talented West Ham side (Ferdinand, Carrick, Joe Cole) and was ever-present in the Chelsea side before Abromovich millions.
The point you should be making, is that the Chelsea side is built around him (cf Totti, Gerrard, Ronaldo etc) which highlights his strengths rather than weaknesses. Even this isn’t so true under Avram Grant who likes to have both Lampard and Gerrard supporting a solo striker. He’d be able to play in any side in the world - if they played to his strengths.
Posted from
United Kingdom

Comments are closed













